Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : ckbsupport@genomenon.com
Ref Type | Journal Article | ||||||||||||
PMID | (34476331) | ||||||||||||
Authors | Hendifar A, Blais EM, Wolpin B, Subbiah V, Collisson E, Singh I, Cannon T, Shaw K, Petricoin EF, Klempner S, Lyons E, Wang-Gillam A, Pishvaian MJ, O'Reilly EM | ||||||||||||
Title | Retrospective Case Series Analysis of RAF Family Alterations in Pancreatic Cancer: Real-World Outcomes From Targeted and Standard Therapies. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
URL | |||||||||||||
Abstract Text | In pancreatic cancer (PC), the RAF family alterations define a rare subset of patients that may predict response to inhibition of the BRAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular and clinical characteristics of RAF-mutated PC may support future development of RAF-directed strategies.Clinical outcomes were assessed across a multi-institutional case series of 81 patients with RAF family-mutated PC. Mutational subgroups were defined on the basis of RAF alteration hotspots and therapeutic implications.The frequency of RAF alterations in PC was 2.2% (84 of 3,781) within a prevalence cohort derived from large molecular databases where BRAF V600E (Exon 15), BRAF ΔNVTAP (Exon 11), and SND1-BRAF fusions were the most common variants. In our retrospective case series, we identified 17 of 81 (21.0%) molecular profiles with a BRAF V600/Exon 15 mutation without any confounding drivers, 25 of 81 (30.9%) with BRAF or RAF1 fusions, and 18 of 81 (22.2%) with Exon 11 mutations. The remaining 21 of 81 (25.9%) profiles had atypical RAF variants and/or multiple oncogenic drivers. Clinical benefit from BRAF/MEK/ERK inhibitors was observed in 3 of 3 subjects within the V600 subgroup (two partial responses), 4 of 6 with fusions (two partial responses), 2 of 6 with Exon 11 mutations (one partial response), and 0 of 3 with confounding drivers. Outcomes analyses also suggested a trend favoring fluorouracil-based regimens over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel within the fusion subgroup (P = .027).Prospective evaluation of RAF-directed therapies is warranted in RAF-mutated PC; however, differential responses to targeted agents or standard regimens for each mutational subgroup should be a consideration when designing clinical trials. |
Molecular Profile | Treatment Approach |
---|
Gene Name | Source | Synonyms | Protein Domains | Gene Description | Gene Role |
---|
Therapy Name | Drugs | Efficacy Evidence | Clinical Trials |
---|
Drug Name | Trade Name | Synonyms | Drug Classes | Drug Description |
---|
Gene | Variant | Impact | Protein Effect | Variant Description | Associated with drug Resistance |
---|
Molecular Profile | Indication/Tumor Type | Response Type | Therapy Name | Approval Status | Evidence Type | Efficacy Evidence | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF V600E | pancreatic cancer | predicted - sensitive | Dabrafenib + Trametinib | Case Reports/Case Series | Actionable | In a retrospective analysis, treatment with the combination of Tafinlar (dabrafenib) and Mekinist (trametinib) resulted in a partial response in two patients with pancreatic cancer harboring BRAF V600E, including one patient with a progression-free survival (PFS) of at least 2 years on third-line therapy and another patient with a PFS of 48 weeks on second-line therapy (PMID: 34476331). | 34476331 |