Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : ckbsupport@genomenon.com
| Ref Type | Journal Article | ||||||||||||
| PMID | (40632975) | ||||||||||||
| Authors | Anbil S, Seewald NJ, Chiorean EG, Hussein M, Kasi PM, Laux DE, Schwartz GK, Shapiro GI, Lin KK, Craib M, Maloney L, McLachlan K, Tukachinsky H, Schrock AB, Wang S, Sokol ES, Decker B, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Reiss KA | ||||||||||||
| Title | LODESTAR: A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Rucaparib in Solid Tumors With Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| URL | |||||||||||||
| Abstract Text | To explore poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor utility across solid tumors and identify biomarkers that predict sensitivity.This single-arm phase II study assessed rucaparib monotherapy in patients with solid tumors and pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D (cohort A) or BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, and RAD51B (cohort B). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A scar-based homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig) and platinum sensitivity status were explored post hoc.Fifty-one patients in cohort A and 12 in cohort B were evaluable for efficacy. ORR of cohort A was 18% (95% CI, 10 to 30). A significantly higher ORR was observed with HRDsig+ tumors compared with HRDsig- tumors (32%; 95% CI, 15 to 54 v 0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14; P < .01). In the entire study population, DCR was 65% (95% CI, 53 to 76), median PFS (mPFS) 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.82), and median OS 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to inferred). PFS and hazard of death from any cause was significantly better for platinum-sensitive tumors (mPFS: 7.8 months v 3.5 months; P = .02; hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.55]). Tumor histology was not independently predictive of outcome. Tumors with PVs in cohort A genes were more likely to be HRDsig+ than tumors with PVs in cohort B genes. Analysis of a large commercial database showed that in noncanonical tumors with BRCA PVs, 30.2% were HRDsig+.Rucaparib has activity in HRDsig+ solid tumors with PVs in homologous recombination repair genes, regardless of histology. Platinum sensitivity correlated with improved outcomes. | ||||||||||||
| Molecular Profile | Treatment Approach |
|---|
| Gene Name | Source | Synonyms | Protein Domains | Gene Description | Gene Role |
|---|
| Therapy Name | Drugs | Efficacy Evidence | Clinical Trials |
|---|
| Drug Name | Trade Name | Synonyms | Drug Classes | Drug Description |
|---|
| Gene | Variant | Impact | Protein Effect | Variant Description | Associated with drug Resistance |
|---|
| Molecular Profile | Indication/Tumor Type | Response Type | Therapy Name | Approval Status | Evidence Type | Efficacy Evidence | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALB2 inact mut | Advanced Solid Tumor | sensitive | Rucaparib | Phase II | Actionable | In a Phase II trial (LODESTAR), Rubraca (rucaparib) treatment led to an overall response rate of 18% (9/51, 1 complete, 8 partial responses), a disease control rate of 63% (32/51), median progression-free survival of 5.52 months, and overall survival of 13.63 months in advanced solid tumor patients harboring pathogenic BRCA1 (n=17), BRCA2 (n=27) PALB2 (n=14), RAD51C (n=1), and RAD51D (n=2) mutations (PMID: 40632975; NCT04171700). | 40632975 |