Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : ckbsupport@genomenon.com
Ref Type | Abstract | ||||||||||||
PMID | |||||||||||||
Authors | S.R. Joris H. Denys J.J. Collignon M. Rasschaert D. T'Kint de Roodenbeke F.P. Duhoux J-L. Canon S. Tejpar J. Mebis L. Decoster P.G. Aftimos J. De Grève | ||||||||||||
Title | 52P Efficacy of olaparib in advanced cancers with germline or somatic tumor mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and ATM: A Belgian precision tumor-agnostic phase II study | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
URL | https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(23)03713-4/fulltext | ||||||||||||
Abstract Text | The Belgian Precision initiative aims to maximize the implementation of tumor-agnostic NGS in patients with advanced cancer and enhance access to molecularly-guided treatment options (MGTOs). Academic tumor-agnostic basket phase 2 studies are part of this initiative. The current investigator-driven trial aimed to investigate olaparib efficacy in advanced cancers with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation (germline or somatic) in a gene that plays a role in homologous recombination (HR). Methods Open-label multi-cohort phase 2 study that examines the efficacy of olaparib in patients with an HR gene mutation in their tumor and failed SoC. Patients with a somatic or germline mutation in the same gene define a cohort. For each cohort, a Simon minimax two-stage design was used. If a response was observed in the first 13 patients, 14 additional patients were included (type I error rate of 5% and a power of 80% when the true response rate is 20%). Here, we report the results on four completed cohorts: patients with a BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 or ATM mutation. Results The overall objective response rate across different tumor types was 11% in the BRCA1 (N=27) and 21% in the BRCA2 (N=27) mutated cohorts. Partial responses were seen in pancreatic cancer, gallbladder cancer, endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas and parathyroid cancer. One patient with a BRCA2 germline mutated colon cancer has an ongoing CR with 19+ months on treatment. mPFS in responding patients is 14+ months (5-34+ months). The clinical benefit rate was 63% in the BRCA1 and 46% in the BRCA2 mutated cohorts. No clinical activity was observed in the ATM (N=13) and CHEK2 (N=14) cohorts. Safety data were consistent with the known profile of olaparib. Conclusions Olaparib showed efficacy in different cancer types harboring somatic or germline mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes but not in ATM and CHEK2. Patients with any cancer type harboring BRCA1/2 mutations should have access to olaparib with real-world documentation of efficacy in a retrospective register. |
Molecular Profile | Treatment Approach |
---|
Gene Name | Source | Synonyms | Protein Domains | Gene Description | Gene Role |
---|
Therapy Name | Drugs | Efficacy Evidence | Clinical Trials |
---|
Drug Name | Trade Name | Synonyms | Drug Classes | Drug Description |
---|
Gene | Variant | Impact | Protein Effect | Variant Description | Associated with drug Resistance |
---|
Molecular Profile | Indication/Tumor Type | Response Type | Therapy Name | Approval Status | Evidence Type | Efficacy Evidence | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 mutant | Advanced Solid Tumor | no benefit | Olaparib | Phase II | Actionable | In a Phase II trial, Lynparza (olaparib) treatment did not demonstrate clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring ATM (n=13) or CHEK2 (n=14) mutations (Ann Oncol (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S242; NCT03967938). | detail... |
ATM mutant | Advanced Solid Tumor | conflicting | Olaparib | Phase II | Actionable | In a Phase II trial, Lynparza (olaparib) treatment did not demonstrate clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring ATM (n=13) or CHEK2 (n=14) mutations (Ann Oncol (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S242; NCT03967938). | detail... |