Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : ckbsupport@genomenon.com
Ref Type | Journal Article | ||||||||||||
PMID | (39516363) | ||||||||||||
Authors | Özgü E, Kaplan BG, Sivakumar S, Sokol ES, Aydın E, Tokat ÜM, Adibi A, Karakoç EG, Hu J, Kurzrock R, Demiray M | ||||||||||||
Title | Therapeutic vulnerabilities and pan-cancer landscape of BRAF class III mutations in epithelial solid tumors. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
URL | |||||||||||||
Abstract Text | Kinase-impaired class III BRAF mutations have recently received attention as a possible prognostic factor and therapeutic target. Class III BRAF variants differ from class I and class II mutations in terms of mechanism of pathway activation and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Genomic landscape analyses of tumors in large real-world cohorts represent a great opportunity to further characterize tumor-related molecular events and treatment vulnerabilities, however, such data is not yet available for tumors with BRAF class III mutations.We investigated the pan-cancer genomic landscape of BRAF class III mutations in 376,302 patients. Patients had comprehensive genomic profiling either by FoundationOne® or FoundationOne®CDx from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue biopsies. 2 patient cases that harbored BRAF class III mutations who demonstrated dramatic response to anti-EGFR treatment were presented.BRAF class III mutations are likely to co-occur with RAF1, NRAS and HRAS alterations, while concomitant KRAS alterations were rare. Moreover, we found that alterations that predict resistance to anti-EGFR agents were significantly less common in tumors harboring BRAF class III mutations, which is of great importance as anti-EGFR therapies are a potential targeted treatment option in these tumors.Our findings suggest a heterogenous interplay of oncogenic alterations in BRAF class III mutated tumors and have important implications for the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis while revealing potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.Tumors harboring BRAF class III (BRAF vIII) mutations comprise a novel subset with distinct genomic heterogeneity. BRAF vIII mutations may sensitize tumors to anti-EGFR treatments. BRAF vIII alterations show significantly less co-occurrence with alterations that predict resistance to anti-EGFR agents. Rare tumors with limited therapy options should be screened for BRAF vIII mutations as they may benefit from anti-EGFR agents. |
Molecular Profile | Treatment Approach |
---|
Gene Name | Source | Synonyms | Protein Domains | Gene Description | Gene Role |
---|
Therapy Name | Drugs | Efficacy Evidence | Clinical Trials |
---|
Drug Name | Trade Name | Synonyms | Drug Classes | Drug Description |
---|
Gene | Variant | Impact | Protein Effect | Variant Description | Associated with drug Resistance |
---|
Molecular Profile | Indication/Tumor Type | Response Type | Therapy Name | Approval Status | Evidence Type | Efficacy Evidence | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF D594G | colon carcinoma | predicted - sensitive | Cetuximab + Trametinib | Case Reports/Case Series | Actionable | In a clinical case study, treatment with the combination of Erbitux (cetuximab) and Mekinist (trametinib) resulted in a radiologic complete response after 6 months in a patient with colon carcinoma harboring BRAF D594G (PMID: 39516363). | 39516363 |
BRAF F595L | intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | predicted - sensitive | Cetuximab + Trametinib | Case Reports/Case Series | Actionable | In a clinical case study, treatment with the combination of Erbitux (cetuximab) and Mekinist (trametinib) followed by Erbitux (cetuximab) monotherapy resulted in an objective response at a follow-up of 6 months in a patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring BRAF F595L along with an IDH2 R172W (PMID: 39516363). | 39516363 |