Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : ckbsupport@genomenon.com
Ref Type | Journal Article | ||||||||||||
PMID | (34117033) | ||||||||||||
Authors | Loree JM, Wang Y, Syed MA, Sorokin AV, Coker O, Xiu J, Weinberg BA, Vanderwalde AM, Tesfaye A, Raymond VM, Miron B, Tarcic G, Zelichov O, Broaddus RR, Ng PKS, Jeong KJ, Tsang YH, Mills GB, Overman MJ, Grothey A, Marshall JL, Kopetz S | ||||||||||||
Title | Clinical and Functional Characterization of Atypical KRAS / NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
URL | |||||||||||||
Abstract Text | Mutations in KRAS/NRAS ( RAS ) predict lack of anti-EGFR efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it is unclear if all RAS mutations have similar impact, and atypical mutations beyond those in standard guidelines exist. We reviewed 7 tissue and 1 cell-free DNA cohorts of 9,485 patients to characterize atypical RAS variants. Using an in vitro cell-based assay (functional annotation for cancer treatment), Ba/F3 transformation, and in vivo xenograft models of transduced isogenic clones, we assessed signaling changes across mutations. KRAS exon 2, extended RAS , and atypical RAS mutations were noted in 37.8%, 9.5%, and 1.2% of patients, respectively. Among atypical variants, KRAS L19F, Q22K, and D33E occurred at prevalence ≥0.1%, whereas no NRAS codon 117/146 and only one NRAS codon 59 mutation was noted. Atypical RAS mutations had worse overall survival than RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC (HR, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-6.80; P = 0.014). We functionally characterized 114 variants with the FACT assay. All KRAS exon 2 and extended RAS mutations appeared activating. Of 57 atypical RAS variants characterized, 18 (31.6%) had signaling below wild-type, 23 (40.4%) had signaling between wild-type and activating control, and 16 (28.1%) were hyperactive beyond the activating control. Ba/F3 transformation (17/18 variants) and xenograft model (7/8 variants) validation was highly concordant with FACT results, and activating atypical variants were those that occurred at highest prevalence in clinical cohorts. We provide best available evidence to guide treatment when atypical RAS variants are identified. KRAS L19F, Q22K, D33E, and T50I are more prevalent than many guideline-included RAS variants and functionally relevant. |
Molecular Profile | Treatment Approach |
---|
Gene Name | Source | Synonyms | Protein Domains | Gene Description | Gene Role |
---|
Therapy Name | Drugs | Efficacy Evidence | Clinical Trials |
---|
Drug Name | Trade Name | Synonyms | Drug Classes | Drug Description |
---|
Gene | Variant | Impact | Protein Effect | Variant Description | Associated with drug Resistance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRAS | A18T | missense | no effect - predicted | NRAS A18T lies within a GTP-binding region of the Nras protein (UniProt.org). A18T results in MAPK/ERK pathway activation similar to wild-type Nras in an in vitro assay (PMID: 34117033), and therefore, is predicted to have no effect on Nras protein function. | |
NRAS | G12R | missense | loss of function | NRAS G12R is a hotspot mutation that lies within a GTP-binding region of the Nras protein (UniProt.org). G12R results in increased MAPK/ERK pathway activation in an in vitro assay, is transforming in culture (PMID: 34117033), and is predicted to lead to a loss of Nras protein function based on the effects of HRAS G12R (PMID: 3042780, PMID: 6092966). | |
NRAS | G13R | missense | loss of function - predicted | NRAS G13R is a hotspot mutation that lies within a GTP-binding region of the Nras protein (UniProt.org). G13R results in increased MAPK/ERK pathway activation in an in vitro assay, is transforming in culture (PMID: 34117033), and can be predicted to lead to a loss of Nras protein function based on the effects of other NRAS G13 mutations. | |
NRAS | K135N | missense | no effect | NRAS K135N lies within the G domain of the Nras protein (PMID: 17384584). K135N results in similar cell proliferation and viability levels to wild-type Nras in cultured cells (PMID: 29533785, PMID: 34117033) and shows similar MAPK/ERK pathway activation to wild-type Nras in an in vitro assay (PMID: 34117033). | |
NRAS | Q61K | missense | loss of function - predicted | NRAS Q61K is a hotspot mutation that lies within a GTP-binding region of the Nras protein (UniProt.org). Q61K results in activation of downstream pathway signaling, increased survival, and transformation of cultured cells (PMID: 22718121, PMID: 34117033, PMID: 33431353), and is predicted to lead to a loss of Nras protein function based on the effects of HRAS Q61K (PMID: 3510078). | |
NRAS | Q61R | missense | loss of function - predicted | NRAS Q61R is a hotspot mutation that lies within a GTP-binding region of the Nras protein (UniProt.org). Q61R results in increased GTP-bound Nras, which leads to activation of Mapk signaling and cell transformation in culture (PMID: 16818621, PMID: 34117033), and is predicted to lead to a loss of GTPase activity based on the effect of HRAS Q61R (PMID: 3510078). | |
NRAS | R164C | missense | no effect - predicted | NRAS R164C lies within the G domain of the Nras protein (PMID: 17384584). R164C results in MAPK/ERK pathway activation similar to wild-type Nras in an in vitro assay (PMID: 34117033), and therefore, is predicted to have no effect on Nras protein function. |
Molecular Profile | Indication/Tumor Type | Response Type | Therapy Name | Approval Status | Evidence Type | Efficacy Evidence | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRAS K135N | colorectal cancer | predicted - sensitive | Cetuximab | Preclinical - Cell line xenograft | Actionable | In a preclinical study, a cell line xenograft model of colorectal cancer expressing NRAS K135N demonstrated similar sensitivity to Erbitux (cetuximab) treatment compared to a NRAS wild-type model (PMID: 34117033). | 34117033 |